4 min left

Design

No. 214

4 min read

The chair that took eleven years to get right

A small workshop spent more than a decade on one seat. What they threw away tells you more than what they kept.

IV

Ines Varga

Design editor

A blue seat on an orange floor

Filed under

The first prototype was carved from a block of foam in an afternoon. The last one, the one now sold in shops, took eleven years, forty-three versions and two changes of factory. The designer behind it, Hanne Oyelaran, keeps every failed version in a storeroom behind her studio, lined up in order like a family photo.

Walk along the row and you can watch a chair learn. Early versions are beautiful and slightly cruel: thin shells that look light but dig into the back of your knees. Later ones get softer, wider, a little heavier. The final chair is not the prettiest in the row. It is the one people forget they are sitting in.

Hand tools on top of table

Why comfort takes so long

Most chairs are tested for strength, not for time. A lab can drop weights on a seat ten thousand times in a week. It cannot tell you how the edge feels after a two-hour dinner, or whether a tall person and a short person both find a place for their elbows.

So Oyelaran built a testing habit instead of a testing machine. Each new version went to five homes for a month: a family with teenagers, a retired teacher, a café owner, a nurse who works nights and a man who reads for four hours every Sunday. They were asked one question at the end: when did you last notice the chair?

Every version felt finished until somebody sat in it for an hour.

What changed between version 1 and version 43

  • The seat grew 18 mm deeper, which sounds small and changed everything.

  • The back stopped being one curve and became two, one for sitting up and one for leaning back.

  • The legs moved outward by a finger’s width so the chair stopped tipping when people stood up.

  • The colour range shrank from twelve to four, because the factory could only match four reliably.

None of these changes photographs well. That is partly why the chair took so long: every year there was pressure to launch the version that looked best in a catalogue, and every year the testers said it was not quite right.

The cost of waiting

Eleven years is expensive. The studio paid for it by designing lamps and shelves in the meantime, some of which paid the rent many times over. Oyelaran is honest that she would not recommend the approach to anyone with investors. “It only works if nobody is waiting for the money,” she says.

Still, the chair has sold steadily for three years without a single price cut, which in furniture is rare. The storeroom of failures is now the thing visitors ask to see first.

What the storeroom teaches

Visitors who come to see the failed chairs usually leave with a different question from the one they arrived with. They come asking how long it took. They leave asking how anyone decides that something is finished. Oyelaran’s answer is practical: a chair is done when five very different people stop mentioning it.

She now applies the same test to smaller projects. A lamp goes to the same five homes for a month. So does a coat hook. Most things pass in two or three rounds. Only the chair needed forty-three.

If you are shopping for a chair yourself, her advice is simple. Sit in it for twenty minutes, not two. Try it with a plate on your knees and with a book. And be suspicious of any chair that looks best from the side, because nobody ever sees their own chair from the side.

“Every version felt finished until somebody sat in it for an hour.”

— Ines Varga

IV

Written by

Ines Varga

Ines writes about furniture, homes and the slow craft of getting objects right. She trained as an interior architect and still sketches every chair she reviews.

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.